Posts Tagged ‘microsoft’

IE Is The Only Secure Browser? Please

It’s no secret that Microsoft’s Internet Explorer has been taking a beating over the past week. After all, Google, the world’s most popular search engine company has blamed a vulnerability in IE for allowing attacks on its systems. After Microsoft admitted it was indeed a flaw in IE that made the attacks possible, the German government released a statement urging people to switch browsers and a similar statement from the government in France soon followed. Microsoft obviously came back with a statement urging users that those governments’ advise was far too strong of a reaction.

Part if Microsoft’s message was spot-on. Switching to a different browser due to a single flaw is a really over-dramatic reaction to the situation. If I immediately stopped using any product that had a vulnerability, I would communicate with no one. Even physical mail can be stolen and has been stolen in the past, therefore one would be forced to live in a hole in the ground, not communicating at all. I would recommend not using IE for far bigger reasons than this single vulnerability, but switching solely because of this is purely sensationalism.

On the other hand, the rest of Microsoft’s message was taken to the opposite extreme. They responded by informing users that switching to a different browser would lead them to an even greater threat. Quoting from Cliff Evans at Microsoft (via TechRadar.com):

The net effect of switching [from IE] is that you will end up on less secure browser

The risk [over this specific] exploit is minimal compared to Firefox or other competing browsers… you will be opening yourself up to security issues.

I’m not aware that the vulnerability exists in other products, but those products may have other vulnerabilities.

As much as I want to say that was intended as a joke, it’s not. Yup, instead of using products that might have vulnerabilities that Microsoft’s UK Security Chief “isn’t aware of”, users should feel comfortable using a browser that has known vulnerabilities used in a real life attack. No, I’m not switching up my stance that users should switch purely for this one incident, but to claim IE as the only secure browser in the world is absolutely ridiculous and laughable. IE’s history doesn’t help it much, but I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt on this one and let that part go.

Related Posts Related Websites

Tags: , ,
Filed under News : Comments (0) : Jan 19th, 2010

Where Do Tablet PCs Fit in the Market?

The web is abuzz with all kinds of bloggers and other writers talking of how 2010 will be ‘the year of the tablet pc‘. I have to admit, these devices look really cool, but where do they fit in? I’m getting a bit confused about what these tablets are supposed to replace and what exact function they would serve in my life.

A conversation by the BBC with Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said it all for me. During the interview, Ballmer was talking about why the tablet would take off this year after years of trying. Ballmer did raise some good points about technology evolving, however, he raised a big question for me. During the interview he stated that, “These things are not replacement [devices] in every sense.” Meaning, one won’t replace their laptop or smartphone with a tablet. My problem is, where does that leave the tablet, then?

For me personally, I’m sick of having more gadgets. I’ve got a BlackBerry, an iPod, a MacBook, a Wii, a DVR, and a desktop computer. I’ve like the idea of having a Kindle and maybe a GPS device, but I’ve been turned off about the idea of having yet another device to throw into my backpack or pocket. If a tablet PC can’t replace one of my gadgets (hopefully a gadget that’s larger than the tablet), then it definitely has no place in my home. In addition to that, I’m not sure what economy these people are living in that we can afford all these devices plus purchase another one that doesn’t let us not purchase either a phone or a laptop.

The closest thing that I’ve heard of a tablet replacing is a netbook. That may be the case, only time will tell. The problem with that logic in my mind, however, is that the tablet PCs will likely be significantly higher-priced than netbooks have been so far which might make them cost-prohibitive as replacements for netbooks.

Of course, only time will tell, but I’m not yet convinced that these tablet PCs will see nearly the market share that we’re being led to believe. If Ballmer is right (I believe he is here) and these devices are just add-ons and not replacements for traditional laptops or smartphones, the tablet is doomed to be a niche product forever.

Related Posts Related Websites

Tags: , ,
Filed under Tech Trends : Comments (0) : Jan 11th, 2010

Upgrade to Windows 7 Because.. It Sucks Less?

Well, after a busy couple of months I’m finally back. I did miss the release of Windows 7 on my blog, but I definitely enjoyed watching the fireworks between Apple and Microsoft through their commercials on tv. Microsoft has definitely come out with a product that the public seems to like (which ultimately is all that matters). One of the commercials, however, caught me a bit off guard.

In the commercial, ‘Angela’ says: “I don’t want to worry about my computer freezing or crashing … and suddenly, Windows 7″. Uh, what? Did we just hear an admission from Microsoft that Vista had problems? I hate to add to my anti-Microsoft list of blog posts, but seriously, what are they thinking with this ad? They should’ve just said: “Upgrade to Windows 7, it sucks less than previous versions”. Definitely not the positive spin on Windows that I was expecting.. With a product out the door that the company can definitely be proud of, I expected them to tout some cool new features, but that’s not the stance we’ve seen from previous versions.

Related Posts Related Websites

Tags: , , ,
Filed under Tech Trends : Comments (3) : Nov 4th, 2009

Is Microsoft Supporting Old Products Only When It Feels Like It?

It was barely a month ago that the web development community watched in horror as Microsoft told the world that dropping support for Internet Explorer 6 was not an option. I completely understand and would agree with the rationale here. They released Windows XP with IE6, so a freshly re-installed desktop would be unsupported if they had dropped support for IE6, which is certainly a bad plan. However, that doesn’t seem to be the same Microsoft that we saw this week when they told us that they won’t be patching the critical TCP/IP flaw found in all versions, but patched in Vista.

What really leaves me scratching my head about these two circumstances is that Windows XP is used by far more users than Internet Explorer 6. It’s commendable that they continue to support IE6 even after some very serious push from the community to try and force users out, but Windows XP market share is still extremely high while IE6 market share is waning. Perhaps the Windows team has been a bit busy lately with patching new vulnerabilities being discovered (though disclosure of the last one was pretty irresponsible assuming it really was released publicly first) as well as finishing off Windows 7.

Related Posts Related Websites

Tags: , ,
Filed under Tech Trends : Comments (0) : Sep 16th, 2009

The Difference Between an Apple and Microsoft Upgrade

Like a good little Apple fan, I went out and purchased a copy of the new Snow Leopard OS from my local Mac store yesterday. I got it home, popped open the box, popped the DVD into my MacBook, told it to upgrade and in 45 minutes or so I was playing with the new features of Snow Leopard. This really was my first operating system upgrade as an Apple fan and I have to say I was impressed. I was an Apple fan before the Leopard release, but I didn’t do an in-place upgrade for other reasons at the time.

Why is this cool or even worth noting? Because that was all I did. I didn’t look at some chart to see which copy of Snow Leopard was right for my computer. I didn’t have to double-check that I was running the 32-bit version instead of 64-bit. I didn’t run my computer and peripherals through some software to make sure they were compatible. All I cared about was that I had a MacBook running Leopard, so I purchased Snow Leopard and popped the DVD in the drive. And guess what? My computer now runs faster! In fact, I am now using something like 6 GB less disk space than before.

The other cool part was that I didn’t reinstall any software, nor did I re-activate anything. Unlike doing an upgrade with Microsoft software involved, I wasn’t treated like a pirate and required to jump through hoops to use my software again. I just loaded it again. The user experience from the store to upgrade complete was very smooth and straight-forward.

While it’s certainly true that the upgrade from Leopard to Snow Leopard was far less of a jump than Windows XP to Vista or even Vista to 7, but it really doesn’t matter. I had to put far less care into the upgrade and just did it. And that (among a few other things) is why I do, and will continue to do for the foreseeable future, recommend Apple products to those who ask me their opinion on what computer to buy.

Related Posts Related Websites

Tags: , , ,
Filed under Tech Trends : Comments (4) : Aug 29th, 2009

« Older Entries