Posts Tagged ‘apple’
Time Machine Backups from Airport Extreme
Hopefully Apple doesn’t make up some way to disable this in the future, but it seems that despite claims elsewhere on the web, the latest Airport Extreme
All you have to do is first plug the hard drive directory into your Mac, partition as desired and format filesystems as an HFS (Mac OS Extended). Then, plugin the drive and enable disk sharing on the Airport. After that’s done, your Aiport should show up in Finder. Once you mount it, you can select it from the Time Machine settings (it will appear as a Time Capsule).
That’s it! Glad I found out and wasn’t deterred by what Apple says and is on their forums. The Airport has been amazing, video streaming is far smoother now unlike with the aging wireless router I was replacing. Definitely a recommended buy!
Tags: airport, apple, backups, mac, networking, time machine
Filed under How-Tos / Tips :
Comments (0) :
Nov 10th, 2011
Enabling Tab Complete for Python Shell on OS X
I have been struggling with an issue for a bit while trying to get tab completion working on the python shell on OS X. I’ve been working on a Django project and not being able to tab complete has been a bit obnoxious. It took a few sessions of searching around to find out what’s going on, so I thought I’d share it in one place. Turns out that the default shell settings are ready to go with tab complete (I spent a lot of time making sure configs were correct), but OS X simply doesn’t ship GNU readline. Instead, Apple just symlinked BSD libedit which is problematic because the default python readline module links to GNU readline.
Someone has already created an egg with readline statically linked just for OS X so the fix is super-easy. Just install the standalone readline module with your favorite python installer. I used:
sudo easy_install readline
Tags: apple, django, mac, os x, python
Filed under How-Tos / Tips :
Comments (0) :
May 30th, 2011
.local CNAME Queries Failing on OS X 10.6.5
I was helping my sister with an issue with connecting to her school’s email server from her MacBook last night and discovered something interesting. Her school uses a webmail.domain.com address for the front end for OWA which is just a CNAME to its real address – a .local address. This all worked fine until a few weeks or so ago – we later pieced together that that’s when she upgraded to 10.6.5.
It seems that in 10.6.5, OS X can’t follow that CNAME for some reason. I could ping the .local address just fine and the browser connected just fine, but when I tried to use the .com CNAME’d hostname, it would fail. The kicker? The dig utility seems to ignore all of this madness which made it lie to me, and that did not help at all while troubleshooting.
I was able to find an Apple forum thread about this with someone saying that rolling back the mDNS binaries to those shipped with 10.6.4 seemed to fix it, but it didn’t help in my case (and some others in the thread). I personally don’t use anything at work or at home using the .local domain, but I hope this gets fixed soon as it breaks a lot of Microsoft-centric networks as a lot tend to use .local for one reason or another..
Tags: apple, dns, os x
Filed under How-Tos / Tips :
Comments (0) :
Dec 7th, 2010
Who’s More Closed Than Apple and Adobe? AT&T
There’s been a significant amount of chatter lately around the Adobe v Apple we’re-more-open-than-thou pissing match, but AT&T has proved once again that vendor lock-in and control in the software industry is nowhere near as bad as the cell phone industry (heck, Verizon will even disable GPS devices in phones to make sure users have to pay for their navigation service).
AT&T has done so by announcing it is nearly doubling its early termination fees on smartphones and netbook data plans. This announcement has some seriously unfortunate timing after rumors of an iPhone able to run on the Verizon network emerged once again and seem to have been validated by AT&T’s rate hikes. As if the fee hikes weren’t enough, AT&T also seems to have taken a really idiotic stance on how it will keep its customers as well.
The money quote from the Wall Street Journal from this last week is that “about 80% of AT&T’s customers are on family-talk plans or business-discount plans, which are very ‘sticky.’” That’s it? That’s the reason AT&T isn’t scared? Because it’s a big pain to switch away? Because I’d have to switch more than one phone at once and that would be annoying? How about: “We’re not scared because we have better coverage and our customers know it” or “We’re not scared because our network is faster” or even “We’re not scared because our customer service is the best”? Instead, we get: “We’re not scared because it’s way too freakin’ expensive to switch.”
Why doesn’t AT&T list any of those reasons as the primary reason? Well, I think the answer is obvious. I work about 2 miles from the Apple headquarters, where you would think coverage on the iPhone with its exclusive provider would be top-notch, if nowhere else. But, alas, I drop calls and don’t get audio on calls all the time. This just doesn’t happen with my Verizon phone (I have an iPhone from work and a Verizon phone for personal use).
All right, now that the rant is over, when I imagine AT&T execs making this decision, all I can think of is:
Tags: apple, at&t, iphone
Filed under Rants :
Comments (0) :
May 23rd, 2010
Soon We Will See Just How Loyal Search Users Are
With today’s announcement that Canonical is changing the default search provider to Yahoo, Apple’s rumored talks with Microsoft, and cell phone providers such as Verizon also jumping to Bing, we may get to see just how big of a role the default settings have on people’s search preferences. Google has been dominating the search market pretty much since the beginning with a significant boost coming from the fact that Google is the default in several of the world’s browsers, though some of it is some good old-fashioned branding and marketing.
Canonical’s decision to change the Ubuntu default search engine and rumors that Apple may be soon to switch the default provider on the iPhone (I’m assuming with regular old Safari soon to follow), Google will no longer be the default on most of the major desktop OS’s of our time. Verizon has also struck a deal with Bing and made it the default search provider on its mobile phones. I personally was pretty mad the day that the Bing icon on my BlackBerry, but that’s a story for another day.
Citing concerns over privacy, there have been several who have spoken out against Google as well. Google has even stated that it is considering pulling out of the huge market of China.
Despite these things, Google’s search market share has continued to increase month after month. These next few months will be interesting to see what happens to market share as these talks fall into place. The true test of the Google brand will be for those users who have to go out of their way to choose Google as their search provider, rather than Google enjoying its nice defaults that it has enjoyed over the past few years.
Tags: apple, bing, google, ubuntu
Filed under Tech Trends :
Comments (0) :
Jan 28th, 2010
Follow whatan00b on Twitter