<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fog Computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatan00b.com/fog-computing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatan00b.com/fog-computing</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Pierson</title>
		<link>http://whatan00b.com/fog-computing/comment-page-1#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Pierson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 14:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatan00b.com/?p=142#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>I have also been using this term for a while now to describe a related situation, but extended.  With cloud computing, corporations have been able to migrate their IT departments to an external service provider, including applications, infrastructure, and even personnel.  I see fog computing the natural evolution of this situation, where the cloud &quot;descends to the ground level&quot; and encompasses and infiltrates the corporation itself, including applications, hardware, and personnel.  As mention above, this might mean application tiers divided internally and externally.  It also means tiers of infrastructure and the supporting personnel.  In general, all three models are currently supported seperately (cloud computing, infra leasing and support, and IT support outsourcing), fog computing incorportates all three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also been using this term for a while now to describe a related situation, but extended.  With cloud computing, corporations have been able to migrate their IT departments to an external service provider, including applications, infrastructure, and even personnel.  I see fog computing the natural evolution of this situation, where the cloud &#8220;descends to the ground level&#8221; and encompasses and infiltrates the corporation itself, including applications, hardware, and personnel.  As mention above, this might mean application tiers divided internally and externally.  It also means tiers of infrastructure and the supporting personnel.  In general, all three models are currently supported seperately (cloud computing, infra leasing and support, and IT support outsourcing), fog computing incorportates all three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Moss</title>
		<link>http://whatan00b.com/fog-computing/comment-page-1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatan00b.com/?p=142#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Totally agree, although I would like to throw in the slightly alternative definition which is that while most people seem to define cloudbusting as leveraging the cloud for load or resiliance purposes, I think that fog computing is really about moving whole tiers of an application into the cloud (e.g. just database) whilst retaining other tiers (e.g. processing/display services) locally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree, although I would like to throw in the slightly alternative definition which is that while most people seem to define cloudbusting as leveraging the cloud for load or resiliance purposes, I think that fog computing is really about moving whole tiers of an application into the cloud (e.g. just database) whilst retaining other tiers (e.g. processing/display services) locally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

